In light of copyright concerns, the New York Times may file a lawsuit against OpenAI

The training of AI models on copyright materials and user data is a big concern for several organizations and institutions. Recently, Zoom was forced to retract its measures regarding the training of its AI model. As of now, we have come across a new debate between OpenAI and The New York Times. As per the available information, The New York Times is apparently thinking about taking legal action to protect its journalistic content and intellectual property rights.

Web scraping by robots is a practice that goes beyond using things that are copyright-free. According to NPR’s report, the prime reason behind the recent issue is OpenAI’s web scraping. As a result, The New York Times reacted to this by changing its policy on services. The new policies restrict the use of The New York Times’s articles and images for the purpose of training AI models.

The publisher is attempting to obtain a licensing agreement that would call for OpenAI to pay The New York Times compensation for the use of its news stories in AI technologies. However, this approach has also opened the door to prospective legal action.

In addition to this, the publication regards the chatbot as an open threat to the newspaper since it creates responses that fetch information from the original reports posted by the editorial team. Such practices are attributed harmful to the newspaper’s survival and the team’s efforts, specifically in instances where organizations like Google and Microsoft conspicuously prioritize these AI-generated chatbot responses over traditional web pages.

Legal action is expected

According to some internal sources, the matter is now on the verge of possible legal action. If this happens, it will be unfavorable to OpenAI. The company might be forced to reconstruct the ChatGPT AI model on the content that holds the due rights. In addition to this, experts contend that the company might be compelled to pay up to $150,000 as a financial liability to The New York Times.

Leave a Reply